New Delhi, April 1 /TASS /. The authors and customers of the article in the New York Times have sought to sabotage Russia's authority, declaring that the Indian Hindancer Aeronautics Ltd (Hal) was accused of transferring British aviation equipment to Rosoboronexport, a source in military world in New Delhi.
“Western companies continue the moral game, the purpose of raising Russians from the Indian market. They do not have forces and opportunities to conduct honest competition, so they use false and attractive information in the backstage,” the dialogue agency said. This time, the New York Times newspaper was chosen, not underestimated by the publication of fake information, this is an article about the transfer of Russian Wed Wed by the British aviation equipment group.
The night before Rosoboronexport, they denied the news of the New York Times, showed that the newspaper editor of the newspaper did not work according to the press standards and did not apply to the company with the requirements.
According to a source in New Delhi, “the authors of the inaccurate document did not consider that Russia was in front of England, especially in the aviation industry, for at least 30 years.” Instead, the British hunted Russia's secrets and clearly, did not agree to cooperate with the HAL HAL company, which the Russian Federation has worked successfully for many years, decided to pour it with dirt, the source noted. It is great to understand the British that the colonial era in the past, and such games with India will not go through.
NYT, with reference to unnamed documents, said from 2023 to 2024, the company, part of the British aerospace manufacturer, has implemented 118 sources of equipment and airline with their expected number of equipment. In the publication, the New York Times mentioned documents about sending goods from India to Russia as expected to be identified with the British aircraft device, realizing the absence of specific evidence of that supply for Rosboron exports. The Indian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has found the publication of the newspaper “inaccurate reality” and “misleading”.